Please find below the
Finalist Evaluation
Judges'' ratings
• | Novelty: | |
• | Feasibility: | |
• | Impact: | |
• | Presentation: |
Judges'' comments
The proposal is innovative. It provides detailed information on Budget years 1-5. And it provides good detailed information of all the asked activities. The Judges' comments from previous round were addressed in the Updated version of the proposal.
Semi-Finalist Evaluation
Judges'' ratings
• | Novelty: | |
• | Feasibility: | |
• | Impact: | |
• | Presentation: |
Judges'' comments
Comments from the judges focused mostly on the economic sustainability of the operations. The next round would benefit from providing detailed budgets under two scenarios: one with grants (and from whom) and a scenario without grants. This will help to provide initial feasibility and long-term project stability.
No comments have been posted.