Global Serious Errors of Design and Environmental , Green Standard of the World by huynhphudat

Yes , please . Wait 100 days is too long .... Is there a chance Advisors , Fellows , come back soon so they can read this proposal ? We need to warn people . We actually need a article to warn 7 billions people and their governments . A some thousand years old errors . Best regards . Huynh . Dear God , please help me .

Dear , blindspotter , summary only allow 2000 character , can you help me increase the lengh to more than 12 character . 1 or 2 paragraphs summary require a lot of character . Thank you

Finished all .

Basically, all the building and paving, which civilization does, is reducing the planet’s natural ability to soak up CO2 . Environmental laws don’t focus on the “already stored carbon” (soil + biomass such as trees/plants/grasses, roots, insects, microbes, and even animals), nor do those laws focus upon the “natural” or previous or new absorption RATES by the biosphere of ambient levels of carbon (current and new emissions) in the atmosphere. I will try my best to explain : Earth = a set of countries and each countries = a set of locations . We know how much CO2 sea absorb , how much CO2 rain forest , ..... many more huge things but we don't know how much CO2 the location we live absorb ( our house , our office ) - and environmental law , green standard never force us to calculate how much CO2 our environment absorb before and after we build buildings . This is errors of environmental laws . And basically our environment absorb less CO2 than before we build buildings . And our scientists never calculate or research how much CO2 environment absorb before / after we build the buildings , bigger or smaller , if it’s smaller this is a chance , huge chance to defeat Climate Change because of smaller absorbing CO2 reason/errors of environment of our house , roads , buildings = set of locations of each countries = set of countries = Earth Ex : we use 50 acres for 1 building + grassland in front of building. Total area = 50 acres = 24 acres for building , 26 acres for grassland ( This is NOAA Center for Weather and Climate Prediction example ) If 50 acres area = 50 acres of forest which 300 trees per acres so if we use 24 acres for building locations , we destroy ( 1 tree absorb 48 lbs CO2 per year ) 24acres * 300* 48 lbs = 345600 lbs CO2 per year. So because of our 24 acres building , our environment absorb less 345600 lbs CO2 than the environment before we build the building . This is a error if WE DON’T FIND A LOCATIONS AND PLANT 6 , 7 TREMBESI WHICH MAKE OUR ENVIRONMENT ABSORB CO2 VALUE AT LEAST EQUAL OR BIGGER THAN ENVIRONMENT OF THE PAST . Next is 26 acres of grassland in front of our building – present environment ( or NOAA CWCP example ) , it will absorb CO2 equal with past environment which contain 26 acres * 300 trees * 48 lbs CO2 = 374400 lbs or not ? If present environment doesn’t absorb CO2 equal with the past environment or smaller , that is 3rd errors . https://www.climatecolab.org/web/guest/plans/-/plans/contestId/1300403/planId/4101 My proposal actions are only focus on a manuscript , an article so a magazine , scientific magazine , a website , a organization officially talk about it . This is warning process . Unless all government officially confirm environment laws , green standard , were wrong , governmental organizations of architectures were wrong when design their cities , countries than we can have a chance to design our countries again – golden opportunity to make Earth soak / store / CO2 .

Thanks. Sounds like this is the error you define, "green standards never force us to calculate how much CO2 our environment absorb before and after we build buildings"? For the actual proposal it sounds like you are choosing between writing an article or proposing a method "to design our countries again – as a golden opportunity to make Earth soak / store / CO2", including tree planting? Of these the 2nd option sounds ideal.

Most of architectures , legislators , environmental scientist only design , advice build cities , town with 30% park , green space , .... 70% for buildings . No one calculate to see how they damage environment by absorbing CO2 index . If a family have a normal house and they want to increase absorbing CO2 index after they destroyed environment to build the house , it cost 10 USD only , if pice of 1 trembesi is 5 USD . Actually , online price = 2.5 USD . I need a manuscript to warn people , so i need protecting environment organization confirm I were right or wrong . If they confirm I were right , than we can have a chance to defeat Climate Change . 1 EPA in USA confirm I were right , all protecting environment organization , all others countries must think about their countries with environmental laws , ...... In the end , is begin to make Earth soak more CO2 . I went to all science forums just because I need to warn members , and find someone help . I come here just because of that reason too .

I need to fix 1 things : to fix errors of design by tree planting with a logical reason . Logical reason . When people know about this logical reason , how many people can fix problem of their house ? I don't know . But type facebook environment group , you will have 906.000.000 result https://www.facebook.com/ewg.org with 310k likes . So if 10% of 310k members have private house , they can fix problem of 31k houses . If 1 family have 1 house , and they plants 4 trembesis for their house , as i advice , the total CO2 will be absorbed = 28.4 * 4* 31000 = 3521600 tons CO2 when Trembesi become adult . http://www.ask.com/question/how-many-members-does-greenpeace-have http://www.greenpeace.org/international/en/about/faq_old/questions-about-greenpeace-in/ How Many Members Does Greenpeace Have? Greenpeace, a global organisation that works on environmental issues, has 2.8 million supporters worldwide. It has national/regional offices in 41 countries around the world. Its headquarters are based in Amsterdam. And how many Environment Group we can find on internet , facebook , Twitter , I don’t know . So if 10% of 2.8 millions members have private house , they can fix problem of 280k houses . If 1 family have 1 house , and they plants 4 trembesis for their house , as i advice , the total CO2 will be absorbed = 28.4 * 4* 280000 = 31808000 tons CO2 when Trembesi become adult . How many Green buildings owners can fix their problem if they know they had problems ? I don’t know , but they have about 65,697 results according to http://www.usgbc.org/projects . We have 19 countries have Green building Councils , not 1 There are about 125000 schools in US and this is where we learn we should protect environment . If someone help me with this manuscript , a newspaper publish it . And than a school will plants some trees to restore environment . After they plant trees to restore the environment , they plant 1 more tree : Trembesi (Samanea saman) , Carbon dioxide is absorbed reaches 28.488,39 kg/year. If 125 000 school do this sample thing , we have : 125 000 * 28.5 = 3562500 tons CO2 is absorbed after 15 years , when trees became mature trees . But according to : http://www.ask.com/question/how-many-schools-are-in-the-world http://wiki.answers.com/Q/How_many_schools_are_in_the_world?#slide=3 We have 100 millions school in the world , after they restore the environment of the past by planting some trees , if only 50% school have enough money to plants more trees , 1 more tree for each school : 50 000 000 * 28.5 = 1 425 000 000 tons CO2 per years . We emit about 29 gigatons CO2 per years . According to http://wiki.answers.com/Q/How_many_skyscrapers_are_there_in_the_world?#slide=3 There are 85767 skycrappers in the world : http://www.ask.com/question/how-many-hospitals-worldwide If after the owners of skycrappers restore the environment of the past by planting some trees , they have money to plant each skycrapper 1 more tree - trembesi : 85767 * 28.5 = 244359.5 tons CO2 per year . Than we have many hotels , motel , hospitals , resorts , industrial areas , factories , theatres , police stations , courts , ......... in the world . They can do it . IF 1 factory emit 365 tons CO2 per year , after they plant some trembesi because of position of the factory , they need more 365 tons CO2 / 28.5 = 13 trees . I think it cost not to much money . An the most important is our houses . How many house in the world can restore the environment of the past and plant 1 more trembesi for each house ? How many factory , company want a perfect Trembesi solution , I don't know .

Great - in your comments above you have both a concise outline of the problem and a concise description of your proposed tree planting solution. Use this to make a concise proposal?

I edited summary , made it shorter , but must contain 3 examples because I need some proofs . I edited proposed action shorter . Hope you like it

Before we build government buildings , we destroy plants can absorb 1000 lbs CO2 , after we build the buildings , the law don't force us plants some trees which can absorb 1000 lbs CO2 . 7 billions people , no one do this . Global Serious error of design if we focus on absorbing CO2 of environment before and after we build buildings .

I contacted US EPA many months ago , all I had is a automatic replied email . Nothing more , perhaps because I'm not famous , not a well known scientist , just a amateur scientist . Than I contact US Green Building Council , they reply me with a promise R&D team will reply me , no thing more . Can you help me to contact US EPA or US Green Building or any organization , tell them about this problem ? I already try , but no one reply me , no one help . Wait 56 days until judge come is too late , what will happen if judge don't choose my proposal , 7 billions people don't have a chance to know problem of all countries .

Huynh - Received your email. Suggest you open the various EPA organizational links I sent you. Read about what each division/office is responsible for and then prepare a succinct letter summarizing your project approach and solution. You can sign the letter, scan it and pass to me to my home email. I can prepare a cover letter for both of us and then mail to the EPA addresses. What office(s) within the EPA do you think would be most interested? Mark

I send an email to you with 2 example and some images . Hope you can help me warn EAP and next we can warn 7 billions people . Really hope !!!

Hello , Paulo This is the first time 1 person ask me a question like that . The buildings I want to analyze are not EPA buildings , NOAA CWCP , ...... . The buildings I want to analyze are White House , House of Parliament of USA , House of President , Prime Minister of many countries , United Nation buildings , NATO headquarter in Brussels , WHO headquarter , World Bank headquarter , IMF headquarter , Oxford , Cambridge , Cambridge , Yale , Harvard Universities ....... because analyzing buildings like these are better . The data I want , I need to move back 50 or 100 years before human build to much cities without knowledge of absorbing / storing / soak CO2 . This is IMPOSSIBLE right now without a help of government but sometimes there is ....... I CAN , MAY update my proposal if I think my update is good , meet my requirement . About Roads , forest policy . But I need to think carefully .

Hello Huynh. Did you get my email regarding your proposal presentation to the EPA, we will present to 5 components within the EPA?

Hello Ecoelite and Scosentinoroush , Ecoelite , yes I had your email . You can send it , time to warn people even for me it's late . You know , before I come here , I have a conversation with some scientific forums , hope can find some help . No one help and than I found this contest . Scosentinoroush , 1 . ...... Green Building Council? On USGBC , they have 66k projects . This is international projects , problem , national problem , .... When governments confirm they have problem with environmental laws , it's better than 1 org confirm even all of them will fix the problem . 2. Trembesi VS native ecosystem . Climate Change = emergency . If native ecosystem absorb CO2 > 28.4 tons CO2 , I will choose them . Trembesi grow very fast and meet my standard . It's not a bad tree , live peacefully with other native ecosystem , live some hundreds years . If I have to choose between 28.5 tons CO2 for each 2.5 USD VS abundance of native ecosystem , 100% I will choose 28.5 tons CO2 for each 2.5 USD . 3. I begin with the most easiest places school and protecting organizations first before I think about governments . I don't like the working speed of governments .

I update proposal with forest policy analyzing .

Proposal update : Trembesi VS tax VS diversity of natural systems .

Update Agriculture , livestock , CO2 , methane , tax , solution . Really hope you will support my proposals .

Hey :-). In Germany you have to pay a tax on impervious surface because rain water then runs into the wastewater system. And if you build something on a area where trees of a certain age or size are staying, you have to pay for regrowth on a compensation area. So your Idea is some how already put into action by the Germans :-) - Congratulations!