2013ag/forestryjudges 2013ag/forestryjudges Jul 3, 2013 01:23 ![]() |
(1) Feasibility is well described and several other ongoing options are noted. (2) It is a novel idea with considerable local potential. (3) Carbon benefit is not very clear. Please quantify or estimate this better. (4) No figures or pictures etc. Please include to strengthen proposal.
|
2013ag/forestryjudges 2013ag/forestryjudges Jul 29, 2013 12:23 ![]() |
Small scale, but proposes scale up, and is widely replicable. We appreciate the integrated plot to market concept, which focuses on not just producing more product or carbon, but also on getting it marketed and realizing the financial benefits. We see this as entirely feasible.
|