Since there are no currently active contests, we have switched Climate CoLab to read-only mode.
Learn more at https://climatecolab.org/page/readonly.
Skip navigation
13comments
Share conversation: Share via:

Aaron Davis

Feb 29, 2016
09:50

Member


1 |
Share via:


This sounds great, and I realize that unlocking mass quantities of energy from a "cold fusion" reaction might be cheap and carbon free.  I just have one question.  What are we going to do with the excess energy. We can't get rid of the energy we get from the sun now.  Lowering CO2 emissions will not stop the oceans from evaporating. 

That's why I am proposing we fix the global radiator in the Arctic before doubling the 12 ZJ of energy the planet currently is absorbing.  Seriously, lets work together to save the planet before we offer everyone cars that go from zero to 60 in under 2 seconds.


https://www.climatecolab.org/contests/2016/industry/c/proposal/1327806


Aaron Davis

Feb 29, 2016
09:50

Member


2 |
Share via:


This sounds great, and I realize that unlocking mass quantities of energy from a "cold fusion" reaction might be cheap and carbon free.  I just have one question.  What are we going to do with the excess energy. We can't get rid of the energy we get from the sun now.  Lowering CO2 emissions will not stop the oceans from evaporating. 

That's why I am proposing we fix the global radiator in the Arctic before doubling the 12 ZJ of energy the planet currently is absorbing.  Seriously, lets work together to save the planet before we offer everyone cars that go from zero to 60 in under 2 seconds.


https://www.climatecolab.org/contests/2016/industry/c/proposal/1327806


Neil Lizotte

Feb 29, 2016
10:57

Member


3 |
Share via:
Proposal
contributor

I do not think we will have a problem with excess energy as we will build power plants as we need them and convert all other power plant to LENR heated systems.  LENR systems will work globally and are more affordable and 100% green.

I do not know anyone that is worried about our oceans evaporating, in fact water levels are rising and will continue to rise.

Electric cars are faster and I wish Edison power and Sunvault would have started with a very cheap electric vehicle for the mass population who can not afford a super car, but that is coming soon.

Batteries that charge in five minutes, while driving are game changers for electric vehicles of all sizes make range anxiety a thing of the past.

I do not agree with you so I will look for people to work with a view that I share.

 


Stevie Harison

Mar 15, 2016
12:01

Catalyst


4 |
Share via:

Hello from Indonesia, Neil !

I see that the idea of LENR you have proposed is perfect.

But, in terms of clean energy, advanced technology and scientific research is a must.

Thus, if you mentioned that it can be implemented all over the world,

the greatest obstacle would be political will from developed countries 

to help developing countries in adopting such this LENR.

I appreciate your feedback.


Neil Lizotte

Mar 17, 2016
01:33

Member


5 |
Share via:
Proposal
contributor

That is why I suggest we need a non profit fund that invests in clean energy technologies for as much of a share in the companies as possible.

Then I propose we invest the profits helping every country and supply low income people all over the World, with clean energy technologies, to go 100% green.

Graphene hybrid EESD's ( Battery) that charge to 90% in 5 minutes, combined with solar power will be a major life improvement, for poor people all over the World.

Fossil fuel subsidies World wide are worth maybe a trillion dollars a year are more, and it should all be invested into a clean energy fund, every year.

LENR will benefit county's that have cold climates are have lots of manufacturing, or power plants that the heating systems can be converted to LENR.

LENR heating will come first and onsite electricity for the homeowner will come later after safety approvals, however The E Cat X is rumored to be able to provide 500 continuous watts of power today.

LENR systems will be very cheap to make and Dr. Andrea Rossi stated he heated his lab for six months of time with $10.00 worth of nickel and a tiny amount of hydrogen.

Investment in research is key and seriously lacking from government.

Hybrid Graphene EESD's are also very cheap soon to be about $40.00 per kwh and they are very safe.

How many batteries can you dead short and have no safety issues or damage to the battery.

For warm climates with low power requirements Graphene EESD's combined with wind or solar will be a good choice.

There is no pollution or waste bi-products with LENR related systems.

I also mentioned Solar Hydrogen Trends, validation tests show that about 50,000 of these unlimited hydrogen on-demand systems could replace all oil from Saudi Arabia.

The technology Diamonds from the sky or what I call Carbon Nano Fibers From the Sky, can benefit advanced battery companies and also many industries.

The Diamonds from the sky approach can lower Co2 emissions to pre-industrial times, but some discussion on how many systems would be needed is happening.

This system makes carbon nano fibers for $1000 per ton and current processes cost $25,000 per ton, so there is money to be made so lets hope governments and big business act fast.

Take Care


Neil Lizotte

Mar 17, 2016
01:04

Member


6 |
Share via:
Proposal
contributor

Hybrid Graphene EESD's will make electric vehicles of all sizes come to life and range anxiety will not be an issue any more.

These EESD's can be charged while driving to 90% or more in five minutes and give a electric car about 500 Km or more maybe and then an on-board generator will charge the EESD and another 500 km and on and on.

Once these EESD's are fully charged they stop taking a charge on their own.

These EESD's will make electric vehicles of all sizes come to life, even 100,000 lb 18 wheel semi trucks like on my website.

The cost of these EESD's is soon to be about $40,00 per Kwh which is several times cheaper then what is available today and they can be 100% green.

 


Kevin Vonmoses

Mar 27, 2016
07:37

Member


7 |
Share via:

If this technology is viable, why does it need to steal money from the Public in subsidies?  If the process is well documented, the intellectual property rights are protected...  Why not sell them to the highest bidder?

The on-board generator is powered by...?  Realize than the sum efficiency has to be less than 100% or it would be a perpetual motion device.

By way of example, a 20hp gasoline generator PRODUCES 10.5 Kw or 824 Btu/minute or 49,704 Btu/hour but USES 3 gallons of gasoline at 115,000 Btu/gallon per hour or 49,704/345,000 = 14.4% efficiency.

If the SOURCE of the electricity is 14.4% efficient, the rest of the machine has to be less than that, accounting for losses.


Neil Lizotte

Mar 28, 2016
01:38

Member


8 |
Share via:
Proposal
contributor

Why do we subsidize fossil fuels with public money, to the global sum of over one trillion dollars per year.

I did not mention anything close to perpetual motion in any way or even close.

The on-board graphene fuel cell converts the hydrogen in the water to electricity to charge the EESD in just five minutes.

By the way fossil fuels can not compete with LENR and it is 100% green and the energy produces is very cheap and sustainable.

I do not know the efficiency of the graphene fuel cell, but it only takes five minutes to charge the EESD to give you 500 KM range in a Electric vehicle.

Please do some research I gave plenty of links to videos and resources. http://www.lenrproof.com/slide_26.html

Sorry I do not agree with you at all.


Manohar Lal Baharani

Apr 10, 2016
06:35

Catalyst


9 |
Share via:

Hybrid Graphene EESD's is definitely a boom for boosting the harnessing of wind and solar energy that are intermittent and variable in nature. There can be many more applications of such a system than just driving. It promises reduction in fossil fuel based energy usage, particularly for warm climate, low power requirement standalone wind / solar energy systems.

Your vision on making this Graphene EESD's an attractive marketable proposition besides technical viability of its integration with wind & solar energy generators (both standalone and grid connected) will enhance the merits of the proposal, I believe. I would like to see / read more updates / links / references to wind & solar power generation projects that have hybrid Graphene EESD's thereby establishing the merits and driving funds for more research. Thanks. Best Wishes. Manohar     


Neil Lizotte

Apr 12, 2016
04:58

Member


10 |
Share via:
Proposal
contributor

Thank you I agree with you 100% and a new update the much larger EESD has been completed on a single cell stage.

They already know they can combine them to make a Megafarad EESD, which will be done in a couple weeks and a video of the results will be posted.

Some people think it is the range you get with a battery, but is a combination of range and the game changing 5 minute charge time.

The EESD Edison Power and Sunvault Energy are working on, is 100% green and by far the safest battery type technology available, I think.

I think I mentioned that graphene EESD's will make solar and wind power come to life.

They are also working on a solar panel with a built in EESD, all in one cell.

Their EESD is currently priced at about $100 per kwh maybe and a goal of $40 ... by the end of the year.

Having the ability to scale the size of the cells in the EESD, will make it very cheap to produce.

There have been no safety issues found so far and on a small cell they cause a dead short and no safety issues at all.

I may have the price break down wrong, but there are plenty of videos and links provided.

Also something interesting the price of lithium just started to sky rocket, maybe because China wants to control supply.


Perry Grossman

May 23, 2016
05:17

Catalyst


11 |
Share via:

Looks cool. The proposal video was informative. The electric truck video was encourage.

It would be great to see more lay person accessible information.

I like your critique of fossil fuel subsidies.

Good luck,

Perry


Neil Lizotte

May 25, 2016
02:16

Member


12 |
Share via:
Proposal
contributor

I would just like to say thanks for letting me share the best solutions to climate change that I have been following since 2008.  

I wish I had a better education to explain these technologies better, these scientists talk in their own language spelling some of the words they use would be a challenge.  

Too bad we could not add videos which explain inventions better then anything I could write.

Take Care good luck everyone

 


Neil Lizotte

May 25, 2016
02:58

Member


13 |
Share via:
Proposal
contributor

I would just like to say thanks for letting me share the best solutions to climate change that I have been following since 2008.  

I wish I had a better education to explain these technologies better, these scientists talk in their own language spelling some of the words they use would be a challenge.  

Too bad we could not add videos which explain inventions better then anything I could write.

Take Care good luck everyone