Since there are no currently active contests, we have switched Climate CoLab to read-only mode.
Learn more at https://climatecolab.org/page/readonly.
Skip navigation
Share via:

Pitch

Combine two existing waste streams Nuclear Waste & Human Excrement to generate Hydrogen into electricity, replacing Fossil Fuel electricity


Description

Summary

Radiolysis  : the radiolytic decomposition of organic material generates Hydrogen "without intense heat required in conventional Nuclear & Thorium Reactors"

May not be "Cold Fusion", but its the closest thing to it.

Infrastructure modification to isolate sewage systems from extreme weather events including "flooding", to direct sewage to Conversion Facilities.

Hydrogen could be used on location to generate electricity. 

S.T.O.L. Aircraft like the DHC-5, could be incorporated to transport Nuclear Waste to and from Radiolysis facilities front door. DRR proliferation concerns.

see crashhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9SzMvKXP8Pc

anything not converting to hydrogen, will be disposed of using Browns Gas "transmutation", DRR increased radioactive waste concerns.

End Product Electricity would be sold similar to existing scenario's.

 

 

 

 

 

 


Category of the action

Reducing emissions from electric power sector.


What actions do you propose?

Terminating Sewage discharge into Rivers, Lakes and Oceans, the hatchery for "Superbugs" AMR.

Closed Dedicated Sewage Systems are Disaster Risk Reduction, preventing commonly additional healthcare issues following extreme weather events. While providing electricity to assist other Recovery efforts. 

The cost of energy would go down, present sewage disposal

cost disappear.

Healthcare costs associated to burning Fossil Fuels illness's and Healthcare costs associated to existing sewage discharge will be dramatically reduced.

alumni of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, could provide direct advisory on a wide variety of technical issues that will arise, such as development of a Standard Reproducible Exposure condition that results in optimum Hydrogen generation.

Educating the masses to reduce Pre-Conditioned responses to the word Nuclear.

Reducing the demand for Land Use away from Bio-Fuels back to

agriculture for food.

 

 


Who will take these actions?

Government oversight of Nuclear Waste import and export issues.

specifically security of central hub facilities that distribute nuclear waste to and from regional conversion facilities. 

Business, buying and selling electrical generating facilities stocks, shares.

Buying and Selling Electricity

Engineering , modification to existing sewage systems.

Labor , high tech unionized skilled jobs

Individuals, refraining from putting non organic materials into toilet.

Human Rights, energy available to all  


Where will these actions be taken?

Everywhere.


How much will emissions be reduced or sequestered vs. business as usual levels?

Future Target Year 2030 Global Emissions reduction of 40%

14 tears to replace all fossil fuel powered electrical generating facilities


What are other key benefits?

Common Purpose, Common Goal, Common Enemy, for all human beings, no discrimination, inclusion defeats disillusion.


What are the proposal’s costs?

Economic costs can be minimal, should established interest's reproduce

inclusion into economics of new system. Technology transfers.

Tar Sands construction skills inclusion expedites to scale implementation

 


Time line

0 - 5  years initial facilities construction (medium population)

R&D required to expedite implementation of full scale facilities.1) Finding Excrement exposure parameters and factors that stimulate Optimum Sustainable Conversion Standard.2) Finding Radiolysis derived Hydrogen and Air Mixture Parameters and Factors that stimulate Optimum Sustainable    Electrical Output.
 R & D Replacing the Primary Viability "Unknown Variable" with a Constant Coefficient of Conversion  : The volume of human excrement that is required to produce 1 GWh of electricity, following a reproducible radiation exposure "Standard" conditions.Expediting scale

5-14 years Global replacement Fossil Fuel Facilities

15,121 of em 

 


Related proposals

not informed no opinion


References

A.V. KREBS  'Blob' Creeps Toward Columbia River http://www.populist.com/99.12.krebs.blob.html  

no meltdown risk Radiolysis Fig 2.1 page 24

 

http://books.google.ca/books?id=-UFDAAAAQBAJ&pg=PA23&lpg=PA23&dq=commercial+radiolytic+hydrogen+production&source=bl&ots=jb8Ba-LLV4&sig=BpfUrhWDr7OPUsc8wTSfvyP2PXQ&hl=en&sa=X&ei=9xxfU_n7IoSY2QWCroGgCA&ved=0CEEQ6AEwAzgK#v=onepage&q=commercial%20radiolytic%20hydrogen%20production&f=false …